🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough format but includes several key adjustments:

• Each team includes only 8 human participants, with the rest filled by 32 bots.
• Activities done by real players grant full XP, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it provides additional choices for gamers seeking alternative methods to enjoy the title. But, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of BF6 players are upset.

Player Responses: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing idea," comments another. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while another lists all the issues they consider to be broken in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads one Reddit comment. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Community Feedback

Despite the support, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of playlists currently available. On a similar note, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to remove XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced so much fun in the initial release, what prompted them to change it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with Battlefield 6, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks being too difficult were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.